Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Gypsy Audio

Gypsy Audio is a collective audio drama company headed by Gwendolyn Jensen-Woodard but populated by a lot of other folks (who have some unique titles "Defender of the Gypsys", "Fanboy", "Guy that shows up to eat all the donuts?"). There are quite a lot of cross pollination of actors and crew from Imagination Lane and for good reason. Like IL, Gypsy focuses somewhat on the feminine side of audio drama and storytelling. Among others, their offerings include "TamLynn: P.I.", "Lara Bond 0012", "Stargazers", "Twisted Tales", "Tomorrow People" and "The Wandering Minstrel". Scope of shows go from general audience to more mature fare.

Website
The website uses a kind of taupe color that permeates the entire scheme and while gives the basic information, is uninteresting to view. The most color goes to the bright tie-dyed image of a "magical mystery tour" Gypsy wagon on the front.
The information describes Gypsy as a kind of eclectic group of people who are just interested in making fun audio drama. The text also encourages people to sign up for their "forum" but there's no link I can glean on the page to get to it?
Another interesting word is "Chivani" which in the "Wandering Minstrel" is described to be a term for "wise woman". But a cursory look on Google and then Wikipedia finds no reference of such a word other than Gypsy audio's use of it?
The right hand side of the website includes links for the rest of the Gypsy pages as well as links to their shows with entry numbers so you can see quickly how many shows each series has produced. Twisted Tales is the current winner with 9 episodes but those are most audio stories than actual audio drama.
The website over all is uninteresting to look at, but still gets you where you want to go.
Rating 2.5/5
 
Audio Drama Type-Theater/Modern Audio Book
While some audio companies treat their productions like a business, Gypsy's audio dramas feel like a hobby and as such becomes a labor of love more than detailed professional quality. The general mood of Gypsy is a bunch of folks pulling up in a wagon, taking a few moments to set up an outdoor stage and presenting their wares. After listening to a number of "Wandering Minstrel" shows I felt like I just spent a weekend at a Renaissance Fair. The focus is on the old trappings of theater and audio storytelling one might get sitting around a roaring fire.

Acting Types: Amateur
While there are very good acting elements in some of Gypsy's productions, whether hampered by meager production values or little direction, much of the acting would be categorized as "fair". Some of the better productions are through the "Lara Bond" shows which show greater attention to detail and their singular shows "Earnest" and "Dracula" have also some stellar performances. MJ Cogburn puts in a steady performance as well as "TamLynn". I've not listened to all the productions however, but a strong hand in guidance and choice of actors would raise the level of all acting in the shows.
Rating 2/5

Production Type- Minimal 
Once again, this rating varies along the lines of the series, but over all the production of some of the core shows needs revamping. Trade offs are made when a production is considered "for our fun" as opposed to "for the listeners" and I think its a poor trade indeed. I do not believe that it is necessary to exchange the intimacy that Gypsy provides simply by raising the bar on the productions. Better sound effects are needed in more appropriate places, and perhaps the greatest sin of all is the differing hisses on many actors. Getting a consistent sound is perhaps one of the most difficult elements of basic production, but it is still a basic requirement for a good production. Nothing drops a listener out of the "magic" of the moment more quickly than hearing actors in two different sound environments pretending they are in the same room.
One bright element is the music. Kevin McLeod is one of the endlessly creative music resources for modern audio drama, and a series of fun Celtic songs are also included on various broadcasts which continue the mood of the simple fun of Gypsy Audio.
Please take the time to standardize your sound across the board. Jim Smagata does a fine job when he's given the best tools to work with and there are others that will help work with you.
Rating 1.5/5

Writing
The writing of Gypsy Audio comes from a number of different sources. Some of the best works come from Alexa Chipman in her take on Lara Bond, and Laura Frechette's poetry is mythic and timeless in Twisted Tales but doesn't fit in to the audio drama world. As I've written before, multi-cast recordings of a poem is still a poem put to audio. Audio drama has its own trappings and requirements. Stargazers has yet to find its footing but TamLynn: PI seems to be one of the strongest ideas out of the Gypsy minds.
Dialog tends to ramble at times and the plots slip and fall from a true course. Strong editing is required in many scripts and the ever present question "Why?" should be asked at every turn.
"Why do I care about this character?"
"Why is this character doing this?"
"Why aren't they just doing this the easy way?"
A back to basics approach is necessary to act as a backbone for the rest of each production. If the script is flawed from the beginning, no amount of acting or production will correct it.
Rating 2/5

Additional Notes
 Beyond their semi-regular offerings, Gypsy also has taken its turn at the wheel of recreating some classics. "The Importance of Being Earnest" and "Dracula" along with "War of the Worlds" and "Frankenstein" are some of the most overly repeated shows in audio history. No one can deny their fascination, but as a reviewer, I would love to see some other classics brought to the ear. How about some lesser known plays to draw in new listeners?

Over All
Despite the sometimes maddening production quality and wandering plots, Gypsy provides something that few other audio companies does for me. It's that ephemeral quality that makes me feel good listening to them. I'm not sure what exactly it is they do. I suspect somehow they drug their RSS feed with the kind of innocent joy they have in making their productions. Gypsy audio in the end is much like being given a hand-made craft. It's been lovingly crafted. It's kind of crude and there's flaws all around it, but it's also reflective that you feel like one of a community in gaining the gift- that you've been welcomed in- instead of being given a product off an assembly line. If that's what they were shooting for, then mission accomplished Lara Bond. My hope is they improve on their craft before handing out their wares.
Rating 2/5

18 comments:

  1. We definitely appreciate the review, and thank you for giving us a listen. We may not agree with all you've said, but as my ex once re-quoted "I'll fight and Die for your right to say it."

    I do have a few questions, but perhaps best asked in private. Oh, and "Chivani" was found on Wikipedia, under Gypsy culture.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wow, someone seems to be doing all they can to mention faults rather than focus on the qualities! Maybe they work for a rival audio company or something. Nevertheless, everyone has an opinion, and they're entitled to it. I tend to just disregard the naysayers. We're all enjoying the work and the listeners are enjoying the results. That's all that matters really.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Gwendolyn. Thanks so much for reading my review. I am certain we'll agree on more than we disagree about audio drama, if not on the specifics of Gypsy. I do enjoy your site and listen to whatever you put out.
    Thanks for the clarification on Chivani. It was frustrating for me not finding it.
    Warmly,
    ~J. Snowe

    ReplyDelete
  4. Terry,
    Thanks for reading my review. Certainly it is not about diminishing someone else's works but rather trying to encourage everyone for a little more maybe.
    The main and most important focus is to give people who are unaware of what's out there, something about the company and eventually the shows themselves.
    Warmly,
    ~J. Snowe

    ReplyDelete
  5. I wasn't completely happy with his review of Gaia either. He tends to be a bit harsh at times (other than when he brutalized poor Tanja) but honest enough. At least we're getting noticed. He says good with the bad and what improvements he suggests are worth taking a look at though I never think it is as bad as he tends to say things are. I'm happy with my writing (writing especially) and mixing though there is always room for improvemrnt. My acting might not be the best but for only being around a year and a half I'm doing pretty darn good. Gypsy has not been around too long and it was a Parsec finalist. That's pretty damn good if you ask me!

    We are all doing this not for money (though getting paid would be nice) but because we love it and to get our stories out there. Are we BBC audio? No. But none of us have those kind of resources. We're a group of artists, actors, and impossible dreamers from all over the world. I'm in Asia at the moment. Others are in New Zealand, America, or Europe. If you think on it, what we do is pretty damn incredible! We organize and connect. We send scripts out all over the world, get our lines in, and let the mixing Wizards do their magic. Some of us have big fancy microphones and others, like me, are working on a mic held together by duct tape. Ask Mak about the mic he first used in audiodrama sometime if you want an interesting story. Many of us use Audition for our mixing others use Sonar (Stevie!) and yet others use Audacity for all their mixing (and I take my hat off to them!). We swipe SFX back and forth and we are always willing to lend a hand and an ear. Despite our different equipment, locations, and software all of us manage to turn out quality audio every month while juggling our real lives. That's impressive!

    Are things going to be perfect? No. There's always going to be a bit of hiss or a flaw. The writing and acting might not ever win an Oscar. But we are telling our stories and not too many people can say that. Tons of people write stories and dream of getting published and getting their work out there. We take the time to make that dream a reality. We're getting heard. Will we please everyone? Nope. And, you know what? I don't care. I'm doing this because I love it and I have stories to tell. I don't write, act, or mix Gaia for everyone else. I do it because I love it and my stories want to be told. I do it for me and if others want to listen and join me for the ride all the better.

    Most of us didn't go to school for this. We're not professional actors, writers, or mixers. We don't make our living doing this. People can grumble, groan, and criticize. But, I have one question for them. Where is your audiodrama? Until you write and especially mix your own show you have no room to talk. Until you have put your blood, sweat, tears, heart, and soul into a production don't you DARE try to preach to me or anyone else who has because you do not have a pot to piss in. You work your heart out and release a show for at least six months. You discover how much hard work and love goes into a production. Then you come talk to me. I might even listen. But until then, don't you DARE shit on my baby or anyone else's cause I'll rip your head off and give it to Armarok to add to the collection on his mantle!

    So, didn't intend to preach or ramble on. But, Gypsy folks, as Bill Hollweg would say YOU ROCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and so does every other single person in the audiodrama community who dares to create and dream!

    Writer, VA of Elizabeth Monroe, Producer of Gaia's Voyages at www.brokensea.com/Gaia

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thank you for reading the works Ms. Barrett. I appreciate your comments.
    Warmly,
    ~J. Snowe

    ReplyDelete
  7. Thanks for the words, James (nice name!). When i read it I took it at the value I think it was intended- honest and constructive. I am sure, at least for my part, that the folk involved do the best they can and I see improvement in all aspects across the board. Thanks, also, for the kind worsd about the detail in my mixing (I am a fiend about it, I think). These comments we should all take to heart in the spirit of encouragement that I found in it.
    Now back to "Strange Stories". oops- different website! (I'm a triple agent).
    - Jim Smagata

    ReplyDelete
  8. James,
    I do want to at least say thanks for the mention of my name in your review. I know that I'm not the best actress in the world, but thank you for the "steady performance" comment.

    Since Gypsy audio is Gwen's baby - please do know that even though I'm sure that you were trying to give some constructive criticism, your review as overall more critical than constructive. But knowing Gwen as I do, she'll take the criticism, review it and process it.

    Thank you for at least listening to Gypsy Audio. I know that Gypsy Audio as a group loves it that people are at least listening to the shows put out with love and care.

    Thanks again,
    MJ Cogburn

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thank you for your comments MJ.
    I think we can all agree that if my reviews are to be supportive instead of actual critiques of the work involved it ceases to be of value to the listener and that is my main audience.
    There are many cheerleaders out there, and I respect what they do.
    What I haven't seen are people who try to analytically spend the time looking at actual well and poorly done audio dramas and speak about them.
    That is what this blog site is for.
    Everyone is entitled to their opinion.
    Mine is not based on personality. It's not based on whether these people are good people or not.
    It's not based on whether I like them as people or not.
    It's not based on how much work that they do in their audio dramas, how much love they have for their friends and family, or how hard they work at their jobs.
    That's not in any way for me to comment on.
    I will be commenting on the finished and released product.
    My contract with you (the reader) is to give you my sometimes unvarnished critique of a company, a series, actors, writing, production, and shows.
    Unlike most of the community, you can be certain that if I like something, it is based on the work released. If I dislike something, it is based on the work released.
    I respect the medium, and the people who put this together to give anything less.
    Warmly,
    ~J. Snowe

    ReplyDelete
  10. First, it take cahones to share ones honest thoughts and I can appreciate that. It can make you a target to folks who don't agree with you, so bob and weave and duck and you'll be fine.

    Ok - it is my honest thought that we as humans evolve and growth and improve when we find what we are not happy with and strive to excel. Sometimes these things with us are not easily visible unless you are on the outside.
    I believe in my heart of hearts that an actor, writer, director, painter, set designer, web tech, carpet cleaner, dog walker, cardio thoracic surgeon, teacher -- Anyone worth their salt, is willing to at least listen and try to understand feedback, good or bad. The good serves us but validating our work. The bad serves us by fueling to the fire to show more and be more. I believe this to be true in life, work, hobbies, cooking, playing - in everything.

    Not having been through your wringer, I don't know the power of your words. If you do put me through, I'll take like woman - standing in my 4" Kenneth Cole's, looking fierce and ready to discuss, b/c that's how I roll, baby... Wait, sorry, I made this about me and not the topic.

    GWEN! GYPSY! Two gals with a shit ton of class. I'll admit I don't listen to all their shows, some are not my cup of tea. The ones on my ipod are very much enjoyed. I get the love they have for it from their work. It's not perfect, but it's perfectly lovely and enjoyable. Gwen and the Gypsy's will take this info and process, like M.J. commented (who is also a lady with a shit ton class).

    And that's all I have at the moment ;)

    Thank you again for sharing your thoughts.

    M Sieiro Garcia

    ReplyDelete
  11. oh yes, I am a crap typist, and thus typos - so very sorry.
    "The good serves us BY validating our work."

    awesome.

    ReplyDelete
  12. My Thanks Ms. Garcia. In the end, my thoughts are only one reviewer's opinion on his own blog. I'm certain there are others who have their own in their place.
    They are absolutely encouraged to do so.
    I'm grateful for the comments and the readers here.
    I must admit, while I had noted there were few if no places that would give a sometimes starkly critical review, I had not expected so many responses to my work.
    You will note, however. True to human nature. Most of the comments given to me are from people who don't like the review.
    Not those who do.
    As human beings we have a tendency to react most effectively to perceived opposition, than we do to convergence.
    Sad that.
    Warmly,
    ~J. Snowe

    ReplyDelete
  13. James,

    I just read your article on the folks at Gypsy Audio and I am glad to see them get some much deserved attention!

    Second, congratulations to you James for having the persistence to see your vision of a site take form.

    As a former audio reviewer myself, I appreciated how you looked at Gypsy's web presence. A group's website should absolutely reflect the style of its creators, and I feel the current Gypsy Audio site does that quite well. A podcaster's website is a great opportunity to "sell" shows to new listeners. and producers are always looking for new ways

    Readers should bear in mind that these websites change over time. The site Gypsy has now is actually quite different than the site I found when I first discovered them. The same is true for many companies like them. As examples, Pendant Audio and Giant Gnome Productions have changed their website over time, and even "independent" shows like Children of Gods have made changes to their websites since they began pod-casting. In short its a process that like pod-casting its self, is always evolving.

    I like how you break down your review in to categories like Acting and Writing. It is important to look at all components of a show. However you might want to consider being more specific with certain categories. For example, using the term Production Values would indicate much more clearly that you'll be discussing sound effects, mixing, editing and the like.

    I will point out a few things I think you overlooked James. First, you failed to mention Gypsy's status as a 2009 Parsec Award Finalist. The Parsecs are a fairly big deal, and even being a finalist is an achievement. This type of information should always be included (if for no other reason, than in the interest of completeness)

    You are reviewing an entire production company, but you have not listened to all their current material? that's hardly fair and something you really should fix in the future.

    In your critiques you mention poor writing and sound effects. Cite specific examples of this whenever possible (i.e. the story lost focus in chapter 3 when I couldn't understand an important piece of dialog between character X and Y) Then, explain why it ruined things for you.

    I noticed you use a number rating system in your reviews. I think you may find as time goes on that ratings systems can be limiting, in many ways. (i.e. what is the exact difference between a rating of 3.5 or 4? is it something you can quantify? if not, then why attach a number to it?)

    Sound quality is EXTREMELY tricky in this medium, so you have to expect that your going to get the occasional pop, hiss or "tinny" sound. It does happen less in professional productions, but it still happens. Do you find yourself listening to a show despite bad sound effects because the plot and/or characters are just that good? point that out :)

    Lastly, as a reviewer your gonna take heat from people when you have something bad to say. I took heat for one of my reviews too... from one of your own followers in fact.

    So be prepared for that by backing up all your points with specific examples. Try to point out the good along with the bad, and you'll do fine in the long run.

    Good Luck,

    Dex

    ReplyDelete
  14. Thanks Dex for the detailed comment. I appreciate the work that took.
    You make a lot of good points. Ironically I think I answered some of them with my "Brush Stroke" post I just finished posting without even seeing this.
    Let me see if I can address your points briefly in order:
    1. Reviews- I do intend to be more specific. The problem being, an overview is a large enough post. Too much specificity can bog down the reader. It is my intention to give a brief overview for listeners to peruse, and then go into depths with show releases and series in the future. Consider many of these posts as "preliminary passes". Certainly not as in depth as they could be.
    2. Web sites. Same as above. I hope that I can post updates to all aspects of a production company including their web site. It would be great value to point people back to sites by expressing a new face lift :)
    3. The Parsec Awards.
    Frankly, and with no degradation intended to anyone for their own awards, I doubt place a lot of stock in any awards. My focus is not about what kind of accolades peers have placed upon shows, but rather how they sound to the listener. I recognize this is a soapbox I may alone stand, but I feel the same way with the Academy Awards. I've seen too many groups get nominated and/or win awards shows by blanketing with a pile of emails and "friends". I want to focus on the work itself.
    4. Reviewing a Company in its entirety. Same as above. I feel that as a listener, taking a sampling is certainly fair game to get a cursory "view" of a company. Details will indeed follow.
    5. Details. That will go into Series and Episodes reviews for the sake of space.
    6. My very first post shows what my scales from 1-5 mean. I urge folks to go back to the first post and read that for themselves. However, consider "three" a passable grade for the average listener who may not be a fan of the genre, "two" is for hard core listeners such as myself. "One" is simply hard to hear at times. "Four" is a very good performance and "Five" is when a company is so good, I feel like I'm stealing from them by downloading their content.
    Hope that helps :)
    7. Sound quality is difficult to manage, but its not impossible. Groups like Decoder Ring use poorer sound quality to inform the audience as to the performance type. Groups like Broken Sea have people coming from all over the world and many times there is no difference in quality. If there was a uniformity of "badness" I would agree with you. As it is, my rule is that if there's such a difference that it throws me out of the story, it needs desperate attention. Sound quality should not be so problematic that it makes me lose my appreciation for the story.
    8. I am endeavoring to make clearer notes on productions and will indeed do so, as I said above, in specific reviews of shows and series. For now I can only merely point to series for general examples.

    Once again, thank you so very much for your feedback, it is appreciated Dex.
    Best of luck with your review site as well!
    Warmly,
    ~J. Snowe

    ReplyDelete
  15. I do feel I should point one small thing out: Broken Sea uses mixers who've been doing it longer (James Smagata on my team not included, as he's not new to it ). I've now mixed...four shows. Alex Gilmour has mixed three, and Laura a few as well. Everyone has to learn, and that's what we're doing. Putting us up against Broken Sea or Decoder Ring, people with far more experience, just makes for a very biased review.

    And, we do our shows for our listeners, not for "our fun". Those, I feel I needed to touch on myself.

    I do still appreciate the review. And hope you take what I've said above into account for future groups. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Hi Gwendolyn. I spent all night thinking about your comment here. Thank you for making me consider it. People who make me think are always on the top of my list. I do appreciate the information you give me about your productions.
    What niggled at me however was "take... into account for future groups".
    So it prompted me to write this post:
    http://audiodramareview.blogspot.com/2010/03/reviews-and-expectations.html
    I hope it helps explain that doing such a thing is impossible for an honest reviewer.
    Warmly,
    ~J. Snowe

    ReplyDelete
  17. As much as I disagree, I would never argue your right to do so. Again, I thank you for listening, and do hope, that you understand it isn't just friends who have had something to say above, but also listeners. I write for myself, I create audio drama, for everyone else.

    ReplyDelete
  18. And please keep doing so. Good criticism (or bad for that matter) should never wilt the artist but prune the edges.
    Warmly,
    ~J. Snowe

    ReplyDelete